discourse-coherent search
"The erotic is a place located between the beginnings of our sense of self and the chaos of our feelings fuertes...
"Pero la pornografía es la negación directa de lo erótico, porque representa la supresión de los verdaderos sentimientos. La pornografía enfatiza la sensación sin sentimientos" (Lo erótico como poder
Audre Lord )
¿Puedo ser amante del arte erotico y al mismo tiempo oponerme a la pornografia? Los que han seguido este blog desde su inicio conocerán mi aficción por el arte erotico. Tambien sabrán que me inclino por el feminismo. Y a veces me cuesta un mundo hacerlos conjugar.
Verán, hay artistas como por ejemplo
Aaron Hawks , Who likes to keep his faithful away from the cozy area of \u200b\u200bthe right politicamete. And I love it. Many of his photos are, do not know how best to express it, espactulares, and most are really molestos.Y want to be bothered. I like art that comes over me. Do not leave me alone. Above all it leaves me thinking. But I want to be bothered by the art. Not pornography. I think pornography and useless simpleton. So boring. Hasti there well. It's just a matter of gustos.No nesecito specified. Define. I like this. The other does not.
But now, gentlemen, I actively oppose certain types of pornography. And I think that not everything should be allowed
. To the extent that contribute to oppression (Not only women but also men. As Paolo Freire
said, there is only mutual release) to the reduction of man to his body. And the reduction of the body to an object. And the reduction of the object property. And as they serve as inspiration and justification of violent acts (the old slogan "the theory = pornography, rape = practice" I think it has much truth) Especially when the works clear (or play directly) areas of pedophilia (by much debated example photos of Sally Mann
) sadism, bestiality or / and incite violence. For me there is a moral issue. But freedom. But the potential victims.
Here is where the problem starts . Where do you draw the dividing line to set "Here ends and here begins the art of oppression, exploitation and social rejection he deserves?
What is the difference between photos of a guy like Hawks (no they do not, will have to see the link) and a well done photo session porn? "The artistic touch? Are the author's intentions? Is the "innocent" eye of the beholder? (And we would like) I really do not know. But I have to find out. And soon. Before coming right-wing conservatives with his speech to prohibit and ban everything. Or the ultra-liberals with their cry "allow and permit everything. "How do I do?
Anyway. My delicious contradictions. In a tray. ... To harness is attached
: - The edge
Sally Mann is currently exposed in the house of culture Stockholm. You can see some of the photos here
- For info on Aaron Hawks
far more provocative look here
- To wash the eyes of all the filth of the world twisted and perverse suggest you watch the Hawks Page
"fixations" - A group of small snapshots blessed by the sharp-eyed photo of Marta
here
Peryera